Mon 29 Jun 2009
Michael Jackson was probably a complex character, just like every single one of us is probably a complex character. He probably did a lot of good things (would being successful at making music be considered a good thing?) and he probably did a lot of wrong things as well. A number of years ago, I got the distinct impression that we all wanted Michael Jackson to go away. The pejorative “Wacko Jacko” gained traction and he was widely maligned by entertainers, reporters, and regular folks. I’m not saying anything new.
Well, we got our wish. He went away. In his death, he’s being celebrated and he should be. Redemption is part of the human experience. I don’t want to take away from the rituals we perform when one passes away, no matter how far from our dailies lives they exist. It just all seems so duplicitous. The very voices and faces that ridiculed the person for who he was now celebrate his life or mourn his passing. I’m having a hard time believing that it’s anything but business for them. Just as they capitalized on his eccentricities and transgressing of our social mores, they’re capitalizing on his death. Part of me recognizes that this part of business. The reality is that one of the purposes of business (if not THE business) is to meet demand and demand comes from us.
So, do we mourn out of pure loss or do we mourn as an act of collective guilt? It was our prurience that brought Michael Jackson’s behavior to the forefront so we could flog him with our words and our brows. I feel that he was, in many ways, one of our modern scapegoats.
My own feelings on Mr. Jackson? I didn’t know him enough to like or hate him. I didn’t like the character Michael Jackson that the media showed me but we all know how that is. I really wanted the stories to go away but really, if it wasn’t him, it would be someone else so my complaint was a general one not one with him per se. His business was his business and the business that other people had with them was just that. My life was in no way enriched by reading the latest goings on.
The one thing we should be talking about that we aren’t talking about is our faceless aggregate prurience and our conceit to being this all-knowing eye. I’d like to see people asking if it’s okay to form an opinion on a subject after reading one news article. What about two? Read five to seven paragraphs on a subject and all of a sudden we’re experts. We’re informed. I just don’t think it works like that.
And yes, yes I am quite guilty of thinking that way myself. That’s why it’s worth talking about.
